Authentication can sometimes feel like a balancing act. On one hand, securing your digital experience is a top priority. Preserving your customers’ trust in your services is often key to maintaining a long-term relationship with your brand. On the other hand, in the age of digital transformation, customers also want a simple, easy-to-navigate digital experience.
Too often, security and user experience are at odds with one another. Extra security can mean extra roadblocks on the customer’s digital journey. It’s hard enough to remember all your usernames and passwords. Factor in two-factor authentication (2FA), SMS text messages and more, and you’re very likely to have frustrated users.
One strategy that can help address these problems is risk-based authentication (RBA). This method involves creating various levels of authentication based on a risk score and built from the risk factors found for each user or activity. In these scenarios, organizations look for users that show anomalous behavior. Perhaps they are using a different device than normal, or accessing their accounts from a different location. In these cases, they will “step up” authentication requirements, only forcing their most risky users to go through the additional step of multifactor authentication (MFA). Then, the remaining low-risk users only need to complete basic authentication steps.
Risk-based authentication is considered an improvement over the alternatives, forcing all users to complete multifactor authentication or having no users complete it. For many organizations, high-risk users make up less than 1 percent of their user population, so there can potentially be considerable savings on operational costs around MFA.
However, RBA strategies still present challenges. Sophisticated attackers may be able to appear as lower-risk users, perhaps using an emulator to mimic a true device. In addition, the vast majority of your low-risk users are still being asked to deal with usernames and passwords — which, at best, can be frustrating to the user experience.
From Measuring Risk to Measuring Trust
What, then, is the alternative? Business leaders must expand their view beyond just fraud and risk detection. A more robust and modern way to address the challenges of security and user experience could be to bring identity to the table, moving from risk scoring to trust scoring. By analyzing both risk indicators and positive identity indicators (behavioral biometrics, user routines, etc.), organizations can understand the context of a user, their behavior, and where they sit on a spectrum of digital identity trust and risk.
Trust scoring can allow organizations to build customized, granular options for the full spectrum of user behaviors. The highest-risk users could still be blocked, but those who are only medium-risk could be allowed in with restrictions on what information they are able to access or what size transactions they are able to complete. Low-risk users — those with a minor anomaly, such as a new device — might be asked to authenticate. Highly trusted users — those who are using a known device with behavioral biometric matches — could even be served a frictionless, passwordless authentication experience.
So, can authentication hurt the user experience? In many cases, it can — but it doesn’t have to. When done well, with a strategy based on trust that combines fraud and identity indicators, authentication can be a seamless and adaptive experience.
💎Valerie Bradford, IBM Security
Updated 8 months ago